Exemption

Cigarette stamping

B&O Tax exemption · RCW 82.04.601 · enacted 2007

All exemptions & deductions

Details

Citation
RCW 82.04.601
Study reference
E1176-1
Tax type
B&O Tax
Preference type
Exemption
Category
Business
Year enacted
2007
End date
None scheduled

Fiscal impact (2024 study estimates)

Revenue if repealed — local ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 0 · FY 2026: 0 · FY 2027: 0
Revenue if repealed — state ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: M · FY 2026: M · FY 2027: M
Taxpayer savings — local ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 0 · FY 2026: 0 · FY 2027: 0
Taxpayer savings — state ($M)
FY 2024: M · FY 2025: M · FY 2026: M · FY 2027: M

CTI = confidential taxpayer information · D = unable to disclose

From the 2024 DOR Tax Exemption Study

Det. No. 19-0283, 40 WTD 265 (December 30, 2021) 267 unstamped cigarettes is considered “prima facie evidence of intent to violate the provisions of [Chapter 82.24 RCW].” RCW 82.24.120(3). Chapter 82.24 RCW imposes a remedial penalty upon any person subject to the chapter who fails to affix the required stamp on a container, or fails to pay any tax due. In addition to any tax due, RCW 82.24.120(1) requires the Department to impose penalties and interest as follows: [A] remedial penalty equal to the greater of ten dollars per package of unstamped cigarettes or ten dollars per twenty roll-your-own cigarettes, or two hundred fifty dollars, plus interest on the amount of the tax at the rate as computed under RCW 82.32.050(2) from the date the tax became due until the date of payment, . . . . RCW 82.24.120(1). See also WAC 458-20-186(705). Whenever the Department issues an assessment for unpaid taxes, it must also include interest. RCW 82.32.050. Here, Taxpayer does not contest that it possessed 28 packs of cigarettes that were missing the tax stamp required under RCW 82.24.030. Taxpayer has presented no evidence to suggest that it is exempt from Washington’s cigarette tax; therefore, w

Does this apply to you?

This is reference data from the 2024 study — not advice, and 2025–26 legislation may have changed it. Three ways to go deeper: