// Refund

Working families' tax credit

Retail Sales & Use Tax refund · RCW 82.08.0206 · enacted 2008

All exemptions & deductions

Details

Citation
RCW 82.08.0206
Study reference
E1569-1
Tax type
Retail Sales & Use Tax
Preference type
Refund
Category
Individuals
Year enacted
2008
End date
None scheduled

Fiscal impact (2024 study estimates)

Revenue if repealed — local ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 0 · FY 2026: 0 · FY 2027: 0
Revenue if repealed — state ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 156 · FY 2026: 171 · FY 2027: 188
Taxpayer savings — local ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 0 · FY 2026: 0 · FY 2027: 0
Taxpayer savings — state ($M)
FY 2024: 141 · FY 2025: 156 · FY 2026: 171 · FY 2027: 188

CTI = confidential taxpayer information · D = unable to disclose

From the 2024 DOR Tax Exemption Study

Det. No. 15-0305, 35 WTD 37 (January 31, 2016) 37 Cite as Det. No. 15-0305, 35 WTD 37 (2016) BEFORE THE APPEALS DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Petition for Refund of ) D E T E R M I N A T I O N Assessment of ) ) No. 15-0305 ) . . . ) Registration No. . . . ) [1] RULE 228; RCW 82.32.090, RCW 82.32.105: LATE PAYMENT PENALTY – WAIVER OR CANCELLATION OF PENALTY. The taxpayer appealed the assessment of a late payment penalty. The taxpayer did not contact the Department to discuss providing additional documentation or amending the original assessment until after the original due date. The Department sustained the late payment penalty because the taxpayer’s situation did not meet the statutory requirements for waiver or cancellation of a penalty. [2] RCW 82.32A.020, RCW 82.32A.030: LATE PAYMENT PENALTY – RELIANCE ON ORAL STATEMENTS BY DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL. The taxpayer appealed the assessment of a late payment penalty. The taxpayer alleged that a Department employee stated that it would not be a problem to qualify for a waiver or cancellation of the penalty. The Department sustained the late payment penalty. Pursuant to statute, Taxpayers have the

Does this apply to you?

This is reference data from the 2024 study — not advice, and 2025–26 legislation may have changed it. Three ways to go deeper: