Credit

Taxes paid in other states

Soft Drinks Syrup Tax credit · RCW 82.64.040 · enacted 1989

All exemptions & deductions

Details

Citation
RCW 82.64.040
Study reference
E1763-1
Tax type
Soft Drinks Syrup Tax
Preference type
Credit
Category
Tax base
Year enacted
1989
End date
None scheduled

Fiscal impact (2024 study estimates)

Revenue if repealed — local ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 0 · FY 2026: 0 · FY 2027: 0
Revenue if repealed — state ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: M · FY 2026: M · FY 2027: M
Taxpayer savings — local ($M)
FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 0 · FY 2026: 0 · FY 2027: 0
Taxpayer savings — state ($M)
FY 2024: M · FY 2025: M · FY 2026: M · FY 2027: M

CTI = confidential taxpayer information · D = unable to disclose

From the 2024 DOR Tax Exemption Study

82.64.040 - Taxes paid in other states Description Businesses may take a credit against the syrup tax for similar taxes paid in another state or foreign county. Purpose Avoids double taxation of the same product. Taxpayer ($ in millions): savings FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 State Taxes Minimal Minimal Minimal Minimal Local Taxes $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Repeal of Repealing this credit would increase revenues. exemption Potential ($ in millions): revenue gains FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 from full repeal State Taxes $0.000 Minimal Minimal Minimal Local Taxes $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Assumptions - West Virginia, Arkansas, and the City of Chicago have various carbonated beverage syrup taxes. - There is no data showing carbonated beverage syrup being imported into the state from these areas. - The revenue impacts are unknown but assumed minimal. Data Sources - Department of Revenue, Excise tax data Additional Additional Information Information Category: Tax base Year Enacted: 1989 Primary Beneficiaries: Carbonated beverage syrup importers Taxpayer Count: Unknown Program Inconsistency: None evident JLARC Review: No review completed 2024 Tax Exemption Study Page 1072 Chapt

Does this apply to you?

This is reference data from the 2024 study — not advice, and 2025–26 legislation may have changed it. Three ways to go deeper: