Special Valuation or Deferral
Forest land, statutory values
Property Tax special valuation or deferral · RCW 84.33.140 · enacted 1971
Details
- Citation
- RCW 84.33.140
- Study reference
- E1350-1
- Tax type
- Property Tax
- Preference type
- Special Valuation or Deferral
- Category
- Nonprofit
- Year enacted
- 1971
- End date
- None scheduled
Fiscal impact (2024 study estimates)
- Revenue if repealed — local ($M)
- FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 1.047 · FY 2026: 2.037 · FY 2027: 2.109
- Revenue if repealed — state ($M)
- FY 2024: 0 · FY 2025: 0 · FY 2026: 0 · FY 2027: 0
- Taxpayer savings — local ($M)
- FY 2024: 34.509 · FY 2025: 35.952 · FY 2026: 37.461 · FY 2027: 39.029
- Taxpayer savings — state ($M)
- FY 2024: 11.667 · FY 2025: 11.788 · FY 2026: 11.911 · FY 2027: 12.037
CTI = confidential taxpayer information · D = unable to disclose
From the 2024 DOR Tax Exemption Study
Det. No. 99-309, 19 WTD 509 (2000) 510 stating he did not want to risk having to pay penalties for deducting any other costs; but his letter requested a finding that his labor costs could be included in his deductions. The return showed a log sale price of $. . . . Taxpayer deducted $. . . for costs to a logging company for “cutting, yarding, loading, trucking.” He also deducted $. . . for charges by a construction contractor for building a temporary road to the site. In addition, he deducted $. . . for the cost of a forest practice permit to cut the timber. The deductions represented 50.66 percent of the total price received for the logs. Because the amount was high, the costs were reviewed by the Department of Revenue’s Forest Tax Division and referred to a Department forester. The forester concluded the costs were reasonable for the area in which the harvest occurred, and the return was accepted as filed. The refund request was forwarded to the Appeals Division for consideration. That taxpayer expressed his frustration that the value of the small harvester’s labor is “not recognized by you as costs that I can deduct from the gross value to determine the taxable stumpage value. .
Does this apply to you?
This is reference data from the 2024 study — not advice, and 2025–26 legislation may have changed it. Three ways to go deeper: